Validating a Method

If you need to demonstrate that the Halogen Moisture Analyzer produces the same results as the reference method, the following information will be of use to you. One possible procedure is presented using the example of ethyl cellulose. Depending on the industry in question, the validation requirements may differ.

First Step: Method Development

You perform a method development and determine the parameters with which you can measure the correct moisture content of your sample. In other words, you obtain both correct and precise results when compared to the reference method (in this case: drying oven).

Table_Vali.jpg
Precision with Highspeed

Präzision mit HighspeedThe Halogen Moisture Analyzers offer both precision and speed. You save time and costs and increase efficiency.

Industry Solutions
Method Database

Guide to Moisture Analysis

Second Step: Check the Linearity

Now check the linearity for a particular range.

Here, you want to demonstrate that the Halogen Moisture Analyzer produces the same values as the reference procedure even if the substance has a different moisture content to the one used for method development.

To do this, condition, for example, two further moisture contents for your sample. In this example dry the ethyl cellulose to 0.4% moisture content and moisten it to 2.6% moisture content.

Now measure the moisture content of the two conditioned samples both with the reference method and the method developed for the Halogen Moisture Analyzer. Calculate the mean values and standard deviations of the results of both procedures and evaluate whether the results are within your defined tolerances. You can draw a diagram like the one below.

Diagramm2Grapha.jpgThe validation graph shows that the results of the moisture measurement recorded with the HR83 match those values obtained using an oven. However, the results are obtained up to 10 times faster.